Home    Bloggers    Messages    Polls    Resources   
Tw  |  Fb  |  In  |  Rss
Comments
You must login to participate in this chat. Please login.

Standards are really a key step to be taken in the direction of the success of the IOT technology , it's really a good subject for a chat
Local Activator

THanks for the great chat, all.

Blogger

Joachim, email me editors@iotworld.com would love to have you as a blogger.

Blogger

Thanks all for a good chat. would like to have som more of these, should perhaps start blogging here not just reading ;)

Local Activator

Nice chat. Thank you all

Blogger

They all keep there businessmodels but opens up to let temperature from alarms move to heating and movement can be used for elderly care and utilitoes can add the energefficiency. regardless of the home technology in place

Local Activator

I'll check it out. THanks. Got to go now. My boss is on the line...

Blogger

I'm doing a project in sweden where we bridge between utility,ventilation,heat and alarms http://iea.sust.se

Local Activator

@joachim, I agree with you.

Blogger

@rich my point is tat it will be hard for telcos to keep up with a 4play device in your home. The dominant service players will not ues it. the role for the ISP will probably be to do good ISP

Local Activator

bye all, nice chat, long live IoT

Worldwide Wizard

Great chat, it provided amazing information, thanks for hosting it. Go to go now. Good day everyone.

Blogger

I need to go too, already late for meeting. Nice chat

Local Activator

@Richard. is there a go to guy on IoT standards?

Blogger

Oleg would really like to have a chat offline you have my email.

Local Activator

@tmbansod, I am not familiar with the P89V51RD2FN microcontroller, maybe philips already released its documentations.

Blogger

Good bye all , great chat.

Local Activator

Yes, I have a company meeting to attend so I have to go too. Great chat, guys! Feel free to carry on without me

Blogger

Sorry, have to run! Have a great weekend!!

Local Activator

Hello All, I had a great chat.

Worldwide Wizard

Joachim, I suspect that tech savvy folks will take your approach, while the general public will go for the turnkey system. But the younger generation is getting pretty tech savvy, so it will be interesting to see how it evolves.

Blogger

@Brian, I heard that P89V51RD2FN microcontroller is going to discontinued from manufacturing by NXP, could you help me to acquire soft core of this microcontroller from philips/NXP?

Worldwide Wizard

The gateway had bad performance was jammed with tricky Wlans. and restrained me from doing anything else

Local Activator

@joachim, was having a single fail point the problem?

Blogger

By duane, nice chatting with you.

Local Activator

And at some point in the future if there's need for more deployment , they can do that ?

Local Activator

I've got to run, folks. It was good chatting.

Blogger

Maybe a mixed approach by ISP's would work : offering a quadruple service using lora protocol. And since lora has a long range, they don't have to deploy routers in every home , only at some homes. This way it costs them very little and doesn;t need them to install antenna poles etc.

Local Activator

I now have my router direct TV no home phone 5 gateways to smart home dvices and it work like a charm

Local Activator

@Joachim, what was the problem?

Blogger

@Rich, it is a good idea to build value over a system that already exists.

Blogger

Rich - The triple play has been evolving. I know a number of people, myself included, that started out with the tripple play bundle but have now dropped the TV third, or even the phone third. In the long-term, ISP will have difficulty using a proprietary gateway to compete with gateways that use broad use standards.

Blogger

Sherly Mendoza just blogged about AllJoyn, tm. I havent seen any news out of them lately, though. I suspect they're not ready to announce yet. Here's their link if you want to sign up to get bullitens from them:https://www.alljoyn.org/

Blogger

@brian @rich that 4play gateway stayed in my home 4 a week before I removed it

Local Activator

@Joachim, it sounds good. Do we have a good supply of high value devices for the home sector?

Blogger

@Rcih, HW would be become a comm architecture in all IoT.   

Worldwide Wizard

@rich, any new inputs on AllJoyn std, it qualcomm brain child

Worldwide Wizard

If APPLE goes bluetooth and google goes IPv6 802.15.4 what will you get at home?

Local Activator

@brian, that is what the ISPs are trying to do with their gateway initiatives, create a high value stream. They called the combination of Internet, phone, and media (TV mostly) a "triple play" and are now looking to add home automation IoT to make a quadruple play.

Blogger

POS is an example of a high value device.

Blogger

@brian that is exactly what is happening and they all provide their necessary gateways

Local Activator

A few high value or revenue generating devices would be able to justify their own ecosystem. And other services could be built around them. 

Blogger

@alex, yes it is. but in this case much of the functionality will need to be in the software rather than the hardware, and packing more into the software makes it more expensive and harder to maintain, as well as complicating things like security. So the hardware is getting cheaper but the software is getting more expensive.

Blogger

@Duane: true.

Local Activator

Alex - I think integration makes thinsg more expensive and complex to start. Then, after some evolution, it makes things easier and less expensive.

Blogger

Due to the double duty, too many gateway with data might be breached out by hecker.

Worldwide Wizard

@Rich: Isn't integration making things cheaper in  general ?

Local Activator

@alex, a router could also serve as a gateway, or the gateway could be a separate device. Trying to pack too much functionality into a single unit really jacks up the price, although it does make things very convenient.

Blogger

@oleg , double duty is interesting. Haven't thought of that.

Local Activator

@tmbansod, fully agree, identification of commonalities is most likely the first step.

Local Activator

@Alex, yes it could be the case. But let's take a look at what we have in our homes (or will have pretty soon). Such devices as solar panel controller, an intelligent thermostat, an EV charger, a pet monitoring station, etc. can always play a double duty of being a gateway.

Local Activator

@OLEG, first we have to identify what is common intelligence in all IoT devices, these common should go in the standard

Worldwide Wizard

We did the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi , www.osgi.orgtests with telco's last millenium in sweden, sadly I don't think a gatway will solve the problem

Local Activator

@oleg,rich : What about a router at the long range access point ? doesn't seem complicated , and gives good latency.

Local Activator

I'm luck in that I have a very progressive coop for my Internet/phone/TV service provider, but I've certainly heard enough stories about monopolistoc telcoms really making things either difficult or expensive.

Blogger

@oleg, that's is valid point.

Blogger

@Duane, yes they do connect at some point. The cloud seems the most likely connection point because at that point it's all just data, but that requires an absolutely reliable Internet connection to work, and faces latency problems. More local control by the gateway solves a lot of those problems, but complicates the interoperability issue.

Blogger

The mechanism is there, it is quite easy to collaborate among alliances and standards bodies. The key is always the willingness of the players.

 

Local Activator

@Rich, @David, I suspect more service providers will be getting involved in gateways, because their fixed line voice revenue has been declining, since a long time. But, this also implies that many standards will be decided by the service provider.

Blogger

We do not know who will win in IoT, conventional service suppliers or OTT newcomers. What is also important is to rely on "islands" of intelligence, in other words in many cases applications do not need to "bounce off the clouds", but they do need to talk to each other.

Local Activator

Even if there are a lot of different standards or proprietary formats, there should be points where the standards cross over. In the TV scenerio I mentioned, all four of those signal types are radically differnent. However, at some point, thay can all connect to the same TV set.

Blogger

We have to provide multiple PHY layers of IoT std, memory foot print must be small

Worldwide Wizard

@Brian, in my view, maybe service or telcons would be involved with gateway.

Worldwide Wizard

I am interested if there is a mechanism and willingness for established standards bodies (ETSI,ANSI, ITU, IEEE) to work with new consortiums like the industrial internet consortium and OneM2M?

Blogger

@Brian, that is the way some of the offerings are being run. My local telecom, CenturyLink, is offering a smart home system with the equipment leased to you. It stays theirs and they manage the system.

Blogger

@oleg, but if the connection is supplied via services, won't long range have better economics ? and that's what matters to ISP's?

Local Activator

I agree, Joachim, it is a pretty challenging task, but we need to start.

Local Activator

Every technology provider wants to secure it's services and will have hadrtime letting a telco gateway or any other intergator provide the access to the customer

Local Activator

Rich - That's a very good point. There's a rental house near mine that has two different satellite dishes installed on the outside. It's wired for fiber optic Internet/TV, and is probably wired for old style copper cable TV.

Blogger

It would be my pleasure!

Local Activator

Thanks Oleg, we are waiting for your inputs after attending IEEE meeting on standards.

Worldwide Wizard

The vision of one standard at home is still a vision and will be a visision for many years

Local Activator

Thanks Joachim. I'll take a look

Blogger

Duane is raising a valid point, that is why we need an architectural framework that also contemplates a sematic interoperability of various services.

Local Activator

Interesting points, are the service providers/telcos going to be responsibile for the gateways?

Blogger

http://xmpp.org/extensions/ and http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Tech_pages/IoT_systems. The idea is to have defined XMPP messages for all IoT traffic between companies just as chat. I have som slides at http://www.slideshare.net/jockelind

Local Activator

One thing I would like to see with home automation is plug-and-play with adding equipment. One of the concerns I have is what you do when you sell your house or move out of your apartment. How do you handle transferring the services and equipment, or take it with you?

Blogger

Absolutely! The greatest benefit is the use of eth same platform for multiple applications. The same platform can serve energy management, ehealth, security, etc.

Local Activator

The problem with gatways at the moment would come in when many companies each have their own gateway. The Belkin WeMo devices that I have use my home WiFi. I've seen some systems advertised that require a separate gateway.

I can imagine a nightmare scenerio when I need three gateways for three differnt brands of electrical fixtures in my hose, another one fore built-in appliances, another one for tools in the garage.

That type of scenerio would be a problem.

Blogger

@Rich, I heard that IBM has been pushing its MQTT standard since last April, there is group of Cisco Systems, General Electric, IBM and Intel are coming together to  to create standards for the sensors inside machines.

Worldwide Wizard

@Oleg, Collaboration might a key factor for both vertical and horizontal standard.  

Worldwide Wizard

Would be happy to share after the first meeting, it is just two weeks away now.

Local Activator

@joachim, can you provide me with a reference to the XMPP-IoT initiative? I'd like to learn more about it

Blogger

I agree with Rich.

Local Activator

I think we will for a long time get alot of gateways through services we buy

Local Activator

Oleg, would love to hear about the group's progress after your meeting this summer

Blogger

Alex - Eventually, I think people will be willing to pay for a gateway. It may just not be labeled as such. If IOT devices piggy back on home WiFi, then there won't necesarily be a separate gateway to buy. Same thing if the phone becomes the gateway. Something like OnStar could be the gateway in cars.

Blogger

@alex, havent heard that people arent willing to pay for a gateway. That's how the home automation systems from Lowes and Home Depot and Staples and others are being marketed now. In a home it seems to me a gateway makes good sense as it can keep your network operating even if it doesn't have Internet access for some reason. A collection of individual long-range connections that coordinate in the cloud seems like a fragile approach.

Blogger

Good morning oleg.

Local Activator

Rich and duane, there will always be many different silos and applications
I would say that the XMPP-IoT initiative to be able to bridge very different technologies and retain businessmodels. Is one of the more interesting ones.

Local Activator

Good Morning, I work for STMicroelectronics and I also chair the IEEE P2413 WG. In my view convergence of multiple domains/verticals is the key attribute of IoT. We need both horizontal and vertical links, a gateway is a great starting point.

Local Activator

Yes, agreed, it makes sense to work on both sides, together.

Blogger

I could see value in making data standards independant of the radio standards. I think that wuold help as the IOT evolves.

Blogger

@Duane, good analogy. We may well end up with a situation where it becomes routine to support multiple approaches to lower layers.

Blogger

@rich , my understanding is that people aren't willing to pay for a gateway. So i wonder if long range access points will be the future ?

Local Activator

Rich "A standard gateway design might need to support all of the above to be acceptable"

Reminds me of the read/write DVD evolution: DVD-R, DVD R+, DVD-RW, DVD-R-... It was pretty confusing at first. Now all of the drives support all of the variations.

Blogger

#duane, that makes sense.

Local Activator

@Brian, both together, I think. Each industry or use case will need to adopt a set of standards but there is also a need for these various verticals to be in agreement on standards where they connect, like in the cloud. We will need both in place for the IoT to really thrive.

Blogger

@Dean, IoT might consider both simultaneously.

Worldwide Wizard

Steve - I agree with that. I'd ne nice to avoid things like NTSC/PAL/SECAM based primarily on geography rather than thechnical or useage requirements.

Blogger

aqlex, right now in the home there is contention among WiFi, ZigBee, Z-Wave, DECT, and others for the wireless link, so no standard there yet. A standard gateway design might need to support all of the above to be acceptable.

Blogger

whether we can use 802.15.4j-2013 - IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment 4: Alternative Physical Layer Extension to Support Medical Body Area Network (MBAN) Services Operating in the 2360 MHz – 2400 MHz Band for some IoT devices

 

Worldwide Wizard

Should the IoT first focus be on vertical standards or horizontal standards?

Blogger

Alex - I think the limit is only in time. Move in time, as technology eveolves toward lower power and smaller devices, more and more parts of our lives will be impacted.

Blogger

@Richard good delineation but my canadian parking meter should be able to share with my american one and it would be nice if all the jet engines could talk to the ecosystem of suppliers around the globe.

Blogger

@duane, and we 2 phy protocols we can cover the home i believe

Local Activator

In the future, ideal standard implementation would be combine in both

Worldwide Wizard

@tmbansod. Almost missed your question. Alas, no, I will not be able to go to Germany. No budget for it. And not really in a position to contribute much to the effort anyway.

Blogger

@duane, but if we built a versatile enough infrasturcture , we don't need to see the limits. And we can always upgrade.

Local Activator

@David, vertical and horizontal are kind of arbitrary, but in general a vertical standard affects a single industry or use case, like a standard for industrial machinery IoT. A horizontal standard crosses many use cases, like standardizing on MQTT as the messaging protocol for IoT devices.

Blogger

David - I can see some differences there. I'd call technologies (e..g, radio standards, protocols, etc.) to be horizontal. Verticals might be things along the lines of materials handling, navigation, medical.

Blogger

Duane, true . We can't see the full impact.

Local Activator

Alex - I think the definition is pretty easy. When talking about limits, I'm not sure we can really say what won't be impacted by the IOT. It's just a matter of time.

 

Blogger

@Steve, yes. I expect to see islands of IoT. I don't see a compelling reason for my smart parking meter to talk to my airplane engine monitoring devices, so different standards there don't seem like they will be a problem. But not all separations are that clear.

Blogger

I am wondering the difference between vertical standard and horizantal standard. 

Worldwide Wizard

@Rich, agreed, data security standards are a work in progress.

Blogger

Rich, good point, I wonder if IoT should be considered to have a head start because some standards have already been tested for the internet. And those can be ported forwarded.

Blogger

Duane , why is it hard to define the limits ? at least for the home , we can come to a clear defintion

 

Local Activator

@Brian, but the NIST standards on data security were created for the traditional Internet, with humans involved in manipulating the data. They are somewhat applicable to IoT, true, but there will need to be some more details added, I think.

Hi Alex

Blogger

IEEE called first meeting on IoT standard in Germany on 10-11 july 2014, they r inviting participation, Rich r u will to go to Germany.

Worldwide Wizard

@Richard that has to result in "islands of IoT"

Blogger

Hi everyone

Local Activator

@Rich, great to be here.

Blogger

@Steve, coordination is going to be a challenge as the IoT will have an impact on virtually all industries and businesses. Getting the whole world together to agree to standards is not something we humans have a good history on...

Blogger

@Tmbansod, thank you, NIST works on some data security standards, requirments that are needed to deal with data security in e-waste.

Blogger

It's such a broad category, that I'm having trouble even knowing where to start in thinking of areas that don't have standards being worked on. With so much potential, I'm not sure any of us even know where the limits of the IOT will be.

How about home gardening on the IOT? Camping on the IOT? Pet care?...

Blogger

Hi brian. No problem. everyone is welcome at any time

Blogger

I agree Richard and there is no good mechanism for coordinating these !

Blogger

tmbansod, I don't know of any standards activity in NIST at this time. I think they're taking a  wait-and-see approach for now.

Blogger

hi brian, welcome

Worldwide Wizard

Good Morning everyone! Sorry I am late.

Blogger

Steve, it's the cross industry standards that I think are going to be the problem. Too much diversity in the needs of the verticals.

Blogger

Anyone know NIST is also designing in standard?

Worldwide Wizard

@Duane. Good question. Perhaps it's too early yet. Need room for experimentation.

Blogger

Another new one has just been published, for getting IoT devices to make available to other devices information on what data they provide. It's called HyperCat. I'll be blogging about it later today.

Blogger

The challenge of IoT as I see it is there is a requirement for both classically vertical standards and new emerging cross industry horizontal standards.

Blogger

Early on, the established companies that have the most to loose seem to bepushing the standards. From the outside, it often looks like they're trying to use standards as an anti-competitive process.

But at some point, enough new things will have been tried that it's good to start settling into standards. Are we at that point yet?

Blogger

Anyone know of an area of the IoT where there should be standards but nothing is being done currently?

Blogger

@Duane, sad to hear but I guess not unexpected. There is great economic advantage in being the one whose technology becomes part of the standard.

Blogger

My other observation, European companies try to push theri stad and Ameriacan companies try to push their std. This happen in Wireless domain

Worldwide Wizard

Steve 140? Even worse than I thought...

Blogger

Rich - A lot more talk than actual work. A lot of jockying for position. Too many people trying to stuff the standards to their advantage.

Blogger

I think IEEE is best organization for standard design, only issues that they take more time

Worldwide Wizard

At a  TIA conference it was claimed that there are over 140 national /international bodies working on IoT standards

Blogger

Welcome Steve. The ITU has an effort that is at least looking at various standards efforts and perhaps providing some coordination.

Blogger

Duane, I would like also hear, not positive?

 

Worldwide Wizard

Early on in the life of something new, like the IOT, I think that overuse of standards, or at least over consolidation, is bad for innovation. At some point, though, the reverse becomes true.

Blogger

Good morning i am interested in the question should someone/body be coordinating these standards?

 

 

Blogger

@Suane, why not a positive experience?

Blogger

Glad you could carve out th etime, Duane. Welcome tmbansod

Blogger

I've been on a few standards comittees. In my experience, it hasn't been a terribly positive experience.

Blogger

Here's the link to the Home Gateway Initiative - http://www.homegatewayinitiative.org/

which is manned by ISPs and the like. The Open Home Gateway Forum has finished developing its code and has disbanded. THe code is with the Open WRT

Blogger

Good evening for asia and good morning to USA people

 

Worldwide Wizard

But I guess that's probably a statement most of us could make.

Blogger

I am sure the specification/ standard will be a living , breathing document for a while as the capabilities  and usages grow.

 

Local Activator

Things have been a bit crazy down my way. Too much work. Too little time.

Blogger

Good morning Duane. Welcome. Long time no hear...

Blogger

Woody, depends on what you mean by a standard. As L2MyOwnDevices pointed out in a comment on my blog, what there is is a specification that is being proposed as a standard. It is supported by the Home Gateway Forum, but it's not been ratified by anyone like IEEE or ACM.

Blogger

Security systems need to keep in touch with the future and as we all know IoT will be big in the future.

Local Activator

Is there an actual published standard?

 

Local Activator

I don't know of any IoT standards efforts in the security field, though, except for those related to home gateways which will support home security.

Blogger

Yes, IEEE, IoT Consortium, IoT -A, IoT -I, Open IoT, AllSeen Alliance, too many to mention.

Worldwide Wizard

I would say pretty much driven as other standards committees with representation from as many parties within the scope as part.

Local Activator

Woody, that question has many answers. There are industry groups, companies and standrds bodies all involved.

Blogger

I think I would like to get involved in writing the standards as we move forward for sure.

Local Activator

Good morning Joachim, although from your name I might guess it's evening there. Welcome. Energy efficienty? So, building automation or smart grid?

Blogger

Who are the principles that have been writing the standards up to now?

 

Local Activator

Welcome, Ralph. So are you involved in defining standards your industry will use in the IoT?

Blogger

Hi I'm Joachim Lindborg from sust.se working in the energyefficiency filed

 

Local Activator

Goor morning Jamie, glad you could make it.

Blogger

I am Ralph and work for ADT security services

 

Local Activator

Good morning all.

Worldwide Wizard

Good morning and welcome. I don't think we've met.

Blogger

good morning

Local Activator

Good morning all. I'm here a bit early just in case someone has trouble with their time zones.

Blogger

We went from not really any IoT Standards in the home automation space and now there are a bunch of different platforms and standards including Apple's HomeKit, Google's Works with Nest and more.  Will device manufacturers play with all these standards or what is the right way to move the industry forward?

 

What is the role of trade organizations in this space like IPSO, IIC, and others?

Blogger

At 8am Pacific time (check your local time zone) we will be having a live chat here on the topic of IoT standards. You can read my blog on Standards, too many or too few to get more details.

If you cannot make it to the live chat, you can leave comments here early, or come back to see the chat archive afterwards.

Hope to see you here.

Blogger


latest blogs
ARM TechCon is only a few weeks away, and if you're doing any ARM-related development it will be the place to be to expand your knowledge and skills.
Controlling IoT devices by voice command has meant using restricted vocabulary or having massive onboard processing, but no longer.
Drivers worldwide increasingly expect their cars to be "the next connected space," according to a global consumer study.
Got a hot IoT idea but not a lot of network expertise? Platform partners can fill the gaps.
Security researchers hack Canon printer firmware to run the classic 1990s video game Doom and wreak havoc with other manipulations.
flash poll
video blogs
SDN's Explicit Forwarding ...
We can't prove based on current usage that SDN ...

1:52

0 comments
IoT Design & the Control Loop
You have to pay attention to the length of the ...

2:01

0 comments
Wearable Tech, IoT & ...
To make wearable tech work we need to be sure the ...

1:57

0 comments
SDN & IoT: It's Complicated
SDN and IoT have some potentially significant ...

2:00

0 comments
3 Dimensions for IoT APIs
Developers building IoT apps will need APIs that ...

2:03

0 comments
How Can We Help Stamp Out ...
What matters is not what you do in an application ...

2:10

0 comments
Another IoT View: ...
Viewing the IoT as a bunch of correlations that ...

2:16

0 comments
IoT, PnP & DIY
Smarter on-net elements for home and process ...

2:07

0 comments
Matching the Cloud & IoT
The cloud, using tools already available from ...

2:04

0 comments
IoT & the 'First Telephone ...
The solution to the IoT's bootstrap problem may be ...

2:06

0 comments
New Single-Board Systems ...
Single-board computers for IoT applications can ...

2:06

0 comments
Taking IoT Security ...
Simple sensors are hard to make smart and hard to ...

2:08

0 comments
The IEEE & the IoT
Howard M. Cohen discusses the IEEE's involvement in ...

1:43

0 comments
No Separate Engineering ...
Howard M. Cohen discusses the likely role of the ...

2:13

0 comments
IoT-as-a-Service
The future for the IoT, at least in the consumer ...

1:26

1 comment
follow us on twitter
like us on facebook
IoT World
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS
Tom Nolle
SDN's Explicit Forwarding & IoT Security

9|12|14   |   1:52   |   (0) comments


SDN uses a central controller to decide what packets can be forwarded, so it could absolutely control access to IoT elements and provide a high level of security. The problem is scalability; we can't prove based on current usage that SDN could scale to large numbers of sensors and valid users. A second model may be needed.
Tom Nolle
IoT Design & the Control Loop

9|8|14   |   2:01   |   (0) comments


Any sensor application has a path from the sensor through a process point and back to the action point, often called a control loop. You have to pay attention to the length in milliseconds of this path or you risk getting so far behind the thing you're controlling that your application will be useless.
Tom Nolle
Wearable Tech, IoT & Authenticity

9|8|14   |   1:57   |   (0) comments


Wearable tech could be combined with IoT to create useful applications from tracking food/beverage nutrition to identifying the store with the best price by looking at various storefronts. To make it work, though, we need to be sure that what IoT provides is authentic, reliable information on which we can base decisions.
Tom Nolle
SDN & IoT: It's Complicated

9|8|14   |   2:00   |   (0) comments


SDN and IoT have some potentially significant natural symbiosis, but not necessarily in the ways everyone is talking about. Two things of special interest are the notion of a "Control and Sensor Network" built on the model of content delivery networks, and IoT security based on SDN principles, both topics to be covered in future vblogs!
Tom Nolle
3 Dimensions for IoT APIs

9|8|14   |   2:03   |   (0) comments


Developers building IoT apps will need APIs that expose IoT assets in three dimensions: geographic area, subject-tracking, and by-sensor-type. All these APIs will have to accept "credentials" so that data can be filtered by the privileges of the requestor. If all this can be done, we can count on rich IoT apps.
Tom Nolle
How Can We Help Stamp Out IoT Hype?

9|8|14   |   2:10   |   (0) comments


IoT, like most tech these days, seems to be all about hype. We can help realign things by focusing on what matters, which is not what you do in an application sense, but what technology models you expose to related IoT components and users with needs.
Tom Nolle
Another IoT View: Correlation & Context

8|27|14   |   2:16   |   (0) comments


The IoT can be viewed as a network of devices, as a web of information, or as a bunch of correlations that provide context for what we do and see. Taking this last view might help create more IoT value, guide us toward low-apple missions, and focus us on the real security concerns.
Tom Nolle
IoT, PnP & DIY

8|20|14   |   2:07   |   (0) comments


Traditional sensor networks don't put low-level elements on the Internet for cost reasons, but smarter on-net elements for home and process control could make the IoT a lot more accessible. In the end, it may be worth the extra cost to get extra participation.
Tom Nolle
Matching the Cloud & IoT

8|15|14   |   2:04   |   (0) comments


The cloud, using tools already available from providers, could offer significant value-add in IoT applications, particularly in making data available from a large, diverse set of sensors and turning that data into big-data/Hadoop repositories or workflows.
Tom Nolle
IoT & the 'First Telephone Problem'

8|15|14   |   2:06   |   (0) comments


You can't sell the first phone, the saying goes, because there's no one to call. The IoT may face a similar bootstrap problem. The solution may be to focus on placing sensors on the objects that interest us, adding environmental sensors as we build the business case.
Tom Nolle
New Single-Board Systems Offer IoT Value

8|15|14   |   2:06   |   (0) comments


New efforts to create single-board computers for IoT applications may add the most value when the systems are deployed as controllers for sets of local sensors. They can lower costs and improve security. But we need to look at the range of applications to be sure we have the needed standards for accessing these controllers.
Tom Nolle
Taking IoT Security Seriously Is Critical

8|8|14   |   2:08   |   (0) comments


Simple sensors are hard to make smart and hard to keep secure, but we have to make security work to make the IoT work.
Video Blogs
The IEEE & the IoT

7|24|14   |   1:43   |   (0) comments


In a companion piece to his blog, IEEE Claims Its Role in the Internet of Things, Howard M. Cohen discusses the IEEE's involvement in the IoT's governance.
Video Blogs
No Separate Engineering Task Force for the IoT

7|23|14   |   2:13   |   (0) comments


In this companion piece to his blog, Who Governs the Internet of Things?, Howard M. Cohen discusses the likely role of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Tom Nolle
IoT-as-a-Service

7|23|14   |   1:26   |   (1) comment


The future for the Internet of Things, at least in the consumer space, may need the offering of services, not just devices.