Home    Bloggers    Messages    Polls    Resources   
Tw  |  Fb  |  In  |  Rss
Rich Quinnell

Tale of 2 Thermostats: An IoT Device Teardown

Rich Quinnell
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Rich Quinnell
Rich Quinnell
11/29/2013 7:41:31 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: automated doors
Actually, the main reason that sliding doors are used rather than swinging doors is that the swinging doors represent a greater hazard. They might swing out and surprise then knock someone over when triggered from the other side. With sliding doors there is no problem.

What the IoT brings to the party is the ability to have the doors open only if you are authorized to enter, using an RFID tag from your smartphone or something. Facial recognition could also be used, but that's probably too expensive an option for commercial applications.

50%
50%
michaelsumastre
michaelsumastre
11/25/2013 2:35:54 PM
User Rank
Worldwide Wizard
Re: automated doors
Most public places already have some sort of automated doors, most of which using proximity sensors that trigger once peopl are within a specific radius. Curiously, it is often used for sliding doors and not for typical swinging designs partly due to addtional hydraulics involved i guess. What I would find more interesting woud be sensing one's car arriving and then thermostats making the right adjustments while door opening after proper facial recognition have been made.

50%
50%
Rich Quinnell
Rich Quinnell
11/21/2013 1:04:31 PM
User Rank
Blogger
automated doors
You may be right about those doors, one day. For now, it appears that there are systems being implemented that at least unlock the door for you as you approach because it recognizes you - either by face or because you carry an RF token. Opening the door will take a motor, and it may be awhile yet before motorized doors become common in homes.

But opening the curtains and turning on the light as well as unlocking the door, those are all functions available now.

50%
50%
SunitaT
SunitaT
11/21/2013 12:24:11 AM
User Rank
Worldwide Wizard
Re : Tale of 2 Thermostats: An IoT Device Teardown
Home automation took yet another turn. IoT is standardized now. And yes, IoT manufacturers will include the time of use in each IoT in the price of the IoT.  Next is happening and we might get an interconnected system in our own homes, and a thermometer that will detect the room temperature, and if it goes under comfort levels, it will signal the climate control system in the house to start heating the place up. The day is not far away when our homes will open the doors if scanners on the hinges detect us.

50%
50%
Rich Quinnell
Rich Quinnell
11/11/2013 4:04:06 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: next Step for developers
Thanks for pointing out WiFi Direct. I was not familiar with this technology, even though it has been around for a few years now. Guess it hasn't really taken off yet. Still, it does have promise. Here's a link to more technical info on WiFi Direct.

50%
50%
Vishal Prajapati
Vishal Prajapati
11/11/2013 1:08:19 AM
User Rank
Local Activator
Re: Talking to the utility
Thanks for the pointers Rich. It is nice to know such a standards are being implemented. If available widely, it would definitely be integrated in the home automation systems which will be able to predict the utility bills in advance and will be able to suggest cost effective usage of the perticular home equipment.

50%
50%
mahendra_agarwal
mahendra_agarwal
11/9/2013 9:28:17 AM
User Rank
Regional Resource
Re: next Step for developers
Rich, overalll article/discussion helping me to understand where different home automation/improvement companies are able to achive so far, their offering to customers to take compartive decisions

At least for  smart thermostat, for communication purpose basically  as of now configuration is based on traditional wifi. but i think going in  future for such equipments Wifi-Direct would also play role 



 

  http://readwrite.com/2013/09/10/what-is-wi-fi-direct#awesm=~omHpnMBQiKV0DY

50%
50%
mahendra_agarwal
mahendra_agarwal
11/9/2013 7:30:56 AM
User Rank
Regional Resource
Re: next Step for developers
>>I wonder how these products could talk if these products use different OS.

Isn;t this can be resloved with the use OS wrapper for diiferent applications, but I think main obstracle could be working of different applications with different communication protocols, Single underlying technology will not be able to satisify all type of applications.

50%
50%
Rich Quinnell
Rich Quinnell
11/7/2013 8:28:04 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Talking to the utility
I believe there are efforts underway to create a standard for smart meters to talk with home automation products and smart appliances. ZigBee is one of them, as this article notes: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/california-expands-the-smart-meter-to-home-area-network-market

Here's an organization involved in setting such standards: Smart Grid Interoperability Panel.

50%
50%
Rich Quinnell
Rich Quinnell
11/7/2013 8:23:10 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: next Step for developers
mahendra, that next step may already be occurring in the smart home. I have seen systems appearing in Lowes and other places that offer a gateway with mulitple and integrated equipment and services for home automation. Not just the one-off offerings these devices represent.

50%
50%
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from Rich Quinnell
Often called the Internet of Cars, vehicle-to-vehicle communications promises huge safety benefits. That's why it is on its way to becoming mandatory in the US.
ARM TechCon is only a few weeks away, and if you're doing any ARM-related development it will be the place to be to expand your knowledge and skills.
Controlling IoT devices by voice command has meant using restricted vocabulary or having massive onboard processing, but no longer.
Got a hot IoT idea but not a lot of network expertise? Platform partners can fill the gaps.
Entrepreneurs working in the Internet of Things who need help getting their business started can use an ever-increasing crop of helpful programs.
flash poll
video blogs
SDN's Explicit Forwarding ...
We can't prove based on current usage that SDN ...

1:52

0 comments
IoT Design & the Control Loop
You have to pay attention to the length of the ...

2:01

0 comments
Wearable Tech, IoT & ...
To make wearable tech work we need to be sure the ...

1:57

0 comments
SDN & IoT: It's Complicated
SDN and IoT have some potentially significant ...

2:00

0 comments
3 Dimensions for IoT APIs
Developers building IoT apps will need APIs that ...

2:03

0 comments
How Can We Help Stamp Out ...
What matters is not what you do in an application ...

2:10

0 comments
Another IoT View: ...
Viewing the IoT as a bunch of correlations that ...

2:16

0 comments
IoT, PnP & DIY
Smarter on-net elements for home and process ...

2:07

0 comments
Matching the Cloud & IoT
The cloud, using tools already available from ...

2:04

0 comments
IoT & the 'First Telephone ...
The solution to the IoT's bootstrap problem may be ...

2:06

0 comments
New Single-Board Systems ...
Single-board computers for IoT applications can ...

2:06

0 comments
Taking IoT Security ...
Simple sensors are hard to make smart and hard to ...

2:08

0 comments
The IEEE & the IoT
Howard M. Cohen discusses the IEEE's involvement in ...

1:43

0 comments
No Separate Engineering ...
Howard M. Cohen discusses the likely role of the ...

2:13

0 comments
IoT-as-a-Service
The future for the IoT, at least in the consumer ...

1:26

1 comment
follow us on twitter
like us on facebook
IoT World
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS
Tom Nolle
SDN's Explicit Forwarding & IoT Security

9|12|14   |   1:52   |   (0) comments


SDN uses a central controller to decide what packets can be forwarded, so it could absolutely control access to IoT elements and provide a high level of security. The problem is scalability; we can't prove based on current usage that SDN could scale to large numbers of sensors and valid users. A second model may be needed.
Tom Nolle
IoT Design & the Control Loop

9|8|14   |   2:01   |   (0) comments


Any sensor application has a path from the sensor through a process point and back to the action point, often called a control loop. You have to pay attention to the length in milliseconds of this path or you risk getting so far behind the thing you're controlling that your application will be useless.
Tom Nolle
Wearable Tech, IoT & Authenticity

9|8|14   |   1:57   |   (0) comments


Wearable tech could be combined with IoT to create useful applications from tracking food/beverage nutrition to identifying the store with the best price by looking at various storefronts. To make it work, though, we need to be sure that what IoT provides is authentic, reliable information on which we can base decisions.
Tom Nolle
SDN & IoT: It's Complicated

9|8|14   |   2:00   |   (0) comments


SDN and IoT have some potentially significant natural symbiosis, but not necessarily in the ways everyone is talking about. Two things of special interest are the notion of a "Control and Sensor Network" built on the model of content delivery networks, and IoT security based on SDN principles, both topics to be covered in future vblogs!
Tom Nolle
3 Dimensions for IoT APIs

9|8|14   |   2:03   |   (0) comments


Developers building IoT apps will need APIs that expose IoT assets in three dimensions: geographic area, subject-tracking, and by-sensor-type. All these APIs will have to accept "credentials" so that data can be filtered by the privileges of the requestor. If all this can be done, we can count on rich IoT apps.
Tom Nolle
How Can We Help Stamp Out IoT Hype?

9|8|14   |   2:10   |   (0) comments


IoT, like most tech these days, seems to be all about hype. We can help realign things by focusing on what matters, which is not what you do in an application sense, but what technology models you expose to related IoT components and users with needs.
Tom Nolle
Another IoT View: Correlation & Context

8|27|14   |   2:16   |   (0) comments


The IoT can be viewed as a network of devices, as a web of information, or as a bunch of correlations that provide context for what we do and see. Taking this last view might help create more IoT value, guide us toward low-apple missions, and focus us on the real security concerns.
Tom Nolle
IoT, PnP & DIY

8|20|14   |   2:07   |   (0) comments


Traditional sensor networks don't put low-level elements on the Internet for cost reasons, but smarter on-net elements for home and process control could make the IoT a lot more accessible. In the end, it may be worth the extra cost to get extra participation.
Tom Nolle
Matching the Cloud & IoT

8|15|14   |   2:04   |   (0) comments


The cloud, using tools already available from providers, could offer significant value-add in IoT applications, particularly in making data available from a large, diverse set of sensors and turning that data into big-data/Hadoop repositories or workflows.
Tom Nolle
IoT & the 'First Telephone Problem'

8|15|14   |   2:06   |   (0) comments


You can't sell the first phone, the saying goes, because there's no one to call. The IoT may face a similar bootstrap problem. The solution may be to focus on placing sensors on the objects that interest us, adding environmental sensors as we build the business case.
Tom Nolle
New Single-Board Systems Offer IoT Value

8|15|14   |   2:06   |   (0) comments


New efforts to create single-board computers for IoT applications may add the most value when the systems are deployed as controllers for sets of local sensors. They can lower costs and improve security. But we need to look at the range of applications to be sure we have the needed standards for accessing these controllers.
Tom Nolle
Taking IoT Security Seriously Is Critical

8|8|14   |   2:08   |   (0) comments


Simple sensors are hard to make smart and hard to keep secure, but we have to make security work to make the IoT work.
Video Blogs
The IEEE & the IoT

7|24|14   |   1:43   |   (0) comments


In a companion piece to his blog, IEEE Claims Its Role in the Internet of Things, Howard M. Cohen discusses the IEEE's involvement in the IoT's governance.
Video Blogs
No Separate Engineering Task Force for the IoT

7|23|14   |   2:13   |   (0) comments


In this companion piece to his blog, Who Governs the Internet of Things?, Howard M. Cohen discusses the likely role of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Tom Nolle
IoT-as-a-Service

7|23|14   |   1:26   |   (1) comment


The future for the Internet of Things, at least in the consumer space, may need the offering of services, not just devices.